Page Header Logo Applied Science and Engineering Progress

PGME Alkaline Wastewater Distillate Treatment by an Alkaliphilic Microbial Consortium: Optimization using Response Surface Methodology with Central Composite Design (RSM-CCD)

Lance Angelo Tamondong Rovillos, Khyle Glainmer Nagtalon Quiton, Kristopher Ray Simbulan Pamintuan, Siang Chen Wu

Abstract


Glycol ethers, especially propylene glycol methyl ether, are widely used as organic solvents in many fields. Although physicochemical treatments are relatively common in treating industrial effluents, their production produces wastewater with extreme conditions like high alkalinity and high chemical oxygen demand (COD), warranting the need for alternatives. In this study, response surface methodology (RSM) was adapted to optimize the operating conditions for the treatment of propylene glycol methyl ether-alkaline wastewater distillate (PGME-AWD) using an alkaliphilic microbial consortium. Thirteen reactors were run according to a central composite design (CCD), creating surface models for peak percentage COD removal, COD removal rate constant, and percentage true color (TC) change by changing values for the factors: initial reactor pH (IRP) from 7.0 to 11.0 and initial substrate concentration (ISC) from 1.0 %v/v to 3.0 %v/v. Pseudo-first order kinetics, with the highest average regression coefficient (RSQ) value from curve-fitting, was used to calculate rate constant parameters. Numerical integration was used to obtain TC parameters. Based on the models obtained, optimal conditions for the responses include the following: IRP of 8.569 and ISC of 1.038 %v/v for the first; IRP of 8.566 and ISC of 1.00 %v/v for the second; and 11.000 and ISC of 3.000 %v/v for the third. This shows that optimizing the third response contradicts the optimization of the first two responses, suggesting separation of treatment into stages: one for COD removal and one for color and turbidity.

Keywords



[1] H. D. Doan, A. Weli, and J. Wu, “A combined photocatalytic and electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing propylene glycol methyl ether and metal ions,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 151, no. 1–3, pp. 51–58, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.041.

[2] Y. Huang et al., “Chemical characterization and source attribution of organic pollutants in industrial wastewaters from a Chinese chemical industrial park,” Environmental Research, vol. 229, Jul. 2023, Art. no. 115980, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115980.

[3] S. Sandhu, A. Zumeit, Z. Tian, V. Vinciguerra, and R. Dahiya, “Semiconductor manufacturing wastewater challenges and the potential solutions via printed electronics,” iScience, vol. 28, no. 10, Oct. 2025, Art. no. 113576, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113576.

[4] J. Sim et al., “A review of semiconductor wastewater treatment processes: Current status, challenges, and future trends,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 429, Dec. 2023, Art. no. 139570, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139570.

[5] J. LaDou, “Printed circuit board industry,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 211–219, May 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.02.001.

[6] R. E. Parker and N. S. Isaacs, “Mechanisms of epoxide reactions,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 737–799, Aug. 1959, doi: 10.1021/cr50028a006.

[7] S. Liang, Y. Zhou, H. Liu, T. Jiang, and B. Han, “Synthesis of propylene glycol methyl ether catalyzed by MCM-41,” Synthetic Communications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 891–897, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00397911003707089.

[8] World Semiconductor Trade Statistics. “WSTS semiconductor market forecast fall 2023.” wsts.org. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2024. [Online.] Available: https://www.wsts.org/76/103/WSTS-Semiconductor-Market-Forecast-Fall-2023

[9] S. S. Chan, K. S. Khoo, K. W. Chew, T. C. Ling, and P. L. Show, “Recent advances biodegradation and biosorption of organic compounds from wastewater: Microalgae-bacteria consortium - A review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 344, Jan. 2022, Art. no. 126159, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126159.

[10] V. Nagabalaji, P. Maharaja, R. Nishanthi, G. Sathish, R. Suthanthararajan, and S. V. Srinivasan, “Effect of co-culturing bacteria and microalgae and influence of inoculum ratio during the biological treatment of tannery wastewater,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 341, Sep. 2023, Art. no. 118008, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118008.

[11] Y. Zhao et al., “Insights into biofilm carriers for biological wastewater treatment processes: Current state-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 288, Sep. 2019, Art. no. 121619, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121619.

[12] R. Sathya, M. V. Arasu, N. A. Al-Dhabi, P. Vijayaraghavan, S. Ilavenil, and T. S. Rejiniemon, “Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by biological methods – A challenges and advantages of recent technologies,” Urban Climate, vol. 47, Jan. 2023, Art. no. 101378, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101378.

[13] W. Shi, Q. Li, R. Qi, H. Tang, and B. Zhang, “Fe3S4/persulfate-based pre-oxidation for mitigating membrane fouling and enhancing synergistic perfluorooctanoic acid removal: Influence of pH and persulfate types,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 692, Feb. 2024, Art. no. 122316, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.122316.

[14] N. C. Lu and J. C. Liu, “Removal of phosphate and fluoride from wastewater by a hybrid precipitation–microfiltration process,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 329–335, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.023.

[15] P. P. Kanekar, S. S. Nilegaonkar, S. S. Sarnaik, and A. S. Kelkar, “Optimization of protease activity of alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from an alkaline lake in India,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 87–93, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00018-4.

[16] United Nations General Assembly. “Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.” sdgs.un.org. Accessed: Mar. 26, 2025. [Online.] Available: https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981

[17] N. Iberache et al., “Removal of the insecticide imidacloprid from water in commercial formulation using electro-Fenton and photo-electro-Fenton: Optimization of COD removal through response surface methodology RSM-CCD,” Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, vol. 196, Feb. 2024, Art. no. 109633, doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2023.109633.

[18] C. F. Bustillo-Lecompte and M. Mehrvar, “Treatment of an actual slaughterhouse wastewater by integration of biological and advanced oxidation processes: Modeling, optimization, and cost-effectiveness analysis,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 182, pp. 651–666, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.044.

[19] K. A. Kumar et al., “Optimization for removal of COD and BOD through RSM-CCD by activated sludge treatment process for pharmaceutical wastewater,” Journal of Environmental Nanotechnology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 68–86, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.13074/jent.2023.12.234486.

[20] J. N. Neetha, K. Sandesh, K. Girish Kumar, B. Chidananda, and P. Ujwal, “Optimization of Direct Blue-14 dye degradation by Bacillus fermus (Kx898362) an alkaliphilic plant endophyte and assessment of degraded metabolite toxicity,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 364, pp. 742–751, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.074.

[21] I. Tiago, A. P. Chung, and A. Veríssimo, “Bacterial diversity in a nonsaline alkaline environment: Heterotrophic aerobic populations,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 7378–7387, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7378-7387.2004.

[22] W. D. Grant, “Cultivation of aerobic alkaliphiles,” Methods in Microbiology, vol. 35, pp. 439–449, 2006. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70021-7.

[23] S. Tizazu, G. Tesfaye, B. Andualem, A. Wang, and A. Guadie, “Evaluating the potential of thermo-alkaliphilic microbial consortia for azo dye biodegradation under anaerobic-aerobic conditions: Optimization and microbial diversity analysis,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 323, Dec. 2022, Art. no. 116235, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116235.

[24] I. M. E. Hassan, “Irregular boundary area computation by Simpson’s 3/8 rule,” Journal of Surveying Engineering, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 127–132, Oct. 1987, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1987)113:3(127).

[25] B. Liengme and K. Hekman, “Numerical integration,” in Liengme’s Guide to Excel® 2016 for Scientists and Engineers, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2020, pp. 317–336. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818249-9.00013-3.

[26] G. Guo et al., “Decolorization and detoxification of azo dye by halo-alkaliphilic bacterial consortium: Systematic investigations of performance, pathway and metagenome,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 204, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 111073, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111073.

[27] R. G. Saratale, G. D. Saratale, D. C. Kalyani, J. S. Chang, and S. P. Govindwar, “Enhanced decolorization and biodegradation of textile azo dye Scarlet R by using developed microbial consortium-GR,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 2493–2500, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.013.

[28] Z. Khan, K. Jain, A. Soni, and D. Madamwar, “Microaerophilic degradation of sulphonated azo dye – Reactive Red 195 by bacterial consortium AR1 through co-metabolism,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 94, pp. 167–175, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.07.002.

[29] M. S. Khehra, H. S. Saini, D. K. Sharma, B. S. Chadha, and S. S. Chimni, “Decolorization of various azo dyes by bacterial consortium,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 55–61, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.10.008.

[30] A. A. Vaighan, M. R. A. Moghaddam, and S. H. Hashemi, “Effect of dye concentration on sequencing batch reactor performance,” Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–16, Jan. 2009.

[31] Md. Z. Hossen, Md. E. Hussain, A. Hakim, K. Islam, Md. N. Uddin, and A. K. Azad, “Biodegradation of reactive textile dye Novacron Super Black G by free cells of newly isolated Alcaligenes faecalis AZ26 and Bacillus spp obtained from textile effluents,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 7, Jul. 2019, Art. no. e02068, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02068.

[32] A. Trivedi, S. Desireddy, and S. P. Chacko, “Effect of pH, salinity, dye, and biomass concentration on decolourization of Azo Dye Methyl Orange in denitrifying conditions,” Water, vol. 14, no. 22, Nov. 2022, Art. no. 3747, doi: 10.3390/w14223747.

[33] M. Priyatharishini and N. M. Mokhtar, “Performance of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) peel coagulant in turbidity reduction under different pH of wastewater,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 46, pp. 1818–1823, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.248.

[34] M. A. D. Flores Alarcón et al., “Efficient dye removal from real textile wastewater using orange seed powder as suitable bio-adsorbent and membrane technology,” Water, vol. 14, no. 24, Dec. 2022, Art. no. 4104, doi: 10.3390/w14244104.

[35] J.-S. Chang, C. Chou, Y.-C. Lin, P.-J. Lin, J.-Y. Ho, and T. Lee Hu, “Kinetic characteristics of bacterial azo-dye decolorization by Pseudomonas luteola,” Water Research, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2841–2850, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00581-9.

[36] S. Ertuğrul, M. Bakır, and G. Dönmez, “Treatment of dye-rich wastewater by an immobilized thermophilic cyanobacterial strain: Phormidium sp.,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 244–248, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.011.

[37] G. D. Saratale, R. G. Saratale, J. S. Chang, and S. P. Govindwar, “Fixed-bed decolorization of Reactive Blue 172 by Proteus vulgaris NCIM-2027 immobilized on Luffa cylindrica sponge,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 494–503, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.01.012.

[38] T. P. Thao, H.-C. Kao, R.-S. Juang, and J. C.-W. Lan, “Kinetic characteristics of biodegradation of methyl orange by Pseudomonas putida mt2 in suspended and immobilized cell systems,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 780–785, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.015.

[39] M. K. Hafshejani, C. J. Ogugbue, and N. Morad, “Application of response surface methodology for optimization of decolorization and mineralization of triazo dye Direct Blue 71 by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” 3 Biotech, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 605–619, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0192-7.

[40] K. M. Zin, M. I. Effendi Halmi, S. S. Abd Gani, U. H. Zaidan, A. W. Samsuri, and M. Y. Abd Shukor, “Microbial decolorization of triazo dye, Direct Blue 71: An optimization approach using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN),” BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Feb. 2020, Art. no. 2734135, doi: 10.1155/2020/2734135.

[41] M. S. A. Amin, F. Stüber, J. Giralt, A. Fortuny, A. Fabregat, and J. Font, “Comparative anaerobic decolorization of azo dyes by carbon-based membrane bioreactor,” Water, vol. 13, no. 8, Apr. 2021, Art. no. 1060, doi: 10.3390/w13081060.

[42] N. Daneshvar, A. R. Khataee, M. H. Rasoulifard, and M. Pourhassan, “Biodegradation of dye solution containing Malachite Green: Optimization of effective parameters using Taguchi method,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 143, no. 1–2, pp. 214–219, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.016.

[43] M. H. Zwietering, I. Jongenburger, F. M. Rombouts, and K. van ’t Riet, “Modeling of the bacterial growth curve,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1875–1881, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1875-1881.1990.

[44] C. Liang, N. de Jonge, P. N. Carvalho, J. L. Nielsen, and K. Bester, “Biodegradation kinetics of organic micropollutants and microbial community dynamics in a moving bed biofilm reactor,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 415, Jul. 2021, Art. no. 128963, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128963.

[45] C. Liang, P. N. Carvalho, and K. Bester, “Effects of substrate loading on co-metabolic transformation pathways and removal rates of pharmaceuticals in biofilm reactors,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 853, Dec. 2022, Art. no. 158607, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158607.

[46] J. R. Ruparelia and H. K. Patel, “Harnessing the chromium reduction potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa JRHM33: A comprehensive study on bioinformatics, phenotype microarray, and CCD-RSM optimization,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 15, Aug. 2024, Art. no. e35650, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35650.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.14416/j.asep.2026.06.003

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.