Page Header Logo Applied Science and Engineering Progress

Home > ONLINE FIRST > Ismianti

Fused Deposition Modeling in Dentistry: A Systematic Literature Review of Materials, Process Parameters, Performance Evaluation, and Clinical Barriers

Ismianti Ismianti, Hasan Mastrisiswadi, Sarah Iftin Atsani, Indra Bramanti, Sri Budi Barunawati, Siti Sunarintyas, Silviana Farrah Diba, Wangi Pandan Sari, Alva Edy Tontowi, Ardiyanto Ardiyanto, Herianto Herianto

Abstract


Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), also known as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), is an additive manufacturing technology that uses filament-based materials to create objects layer by layer. Recognized for its affordability and ease of use, FDM has found widespread applications across various industries, including dentistry. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the materials, machines, parameters, applications, and tests associated with the use of FDM/FFF technology in dental applications. Through a detailed process of identification and screening, 378 articles of literature were reviewed, and 52 relevant studies were selected for in-depth analysis. The review highlights key trends in the use of FDM in dentistry, focusing on the advancements in materials such as biocompatible polymers and their impact on clinical outcomes. Additionally, the paper discusses machine configurations, operational parameters, and various tests conducted to assess the performance and reliability of FDM-printed dental products. This paper also identifies the key determinants and barriers to the application of FDM in dentistry. This review serves as a valuable resource for dental practitioners and researchers, offering insights into current practices and identifying potential gaps for future research in the field.

Keywords



[1]           N. Y. Kim, C. D. Donaldson, D. Wertheim, and F. B. Naini, “Accuracy and precision of three-dimensionally printed orthognathic surgical splints,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 14, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 14, doi: 10.3390/app14146089.

[2]           K. Janjić et al., “The impact of print orientation and graphene nanoplatelets on biaxial flexural strength and cytotoxicity of a 3D printable resin for occlusal splints,” Dental Materials, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1742–1752, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.031.

[3]           S. Atam, C. L. Pereira, H. R. Shah, W. Hou, and W. J. Rody Jr, “Optimization of three-dimensional printing parameters for orthodontic applications,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 375–382, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.2319/102423-722.1.

[4]           I. O. Oladele, L. N. Onuh, S. Siengchin, M. R. Sanjay, and S. O. Adelani, “Modern applications of polymer composites in structural industries: A review of philosophies, product development, and graphical applications,” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 6884, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.asep.2023.07.003.

[5]           M. Rana, M. Kumar, and R. Kumar, “Fused deposition modelling approach in recycled polypropylene/aluminum powder composites for sustainable development,” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 7501, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.asep.2024.07.009.

[6]           M. Juneja, D. Bajaj, N. Thakur, and P. Jindal, “Reproduction of human dental models using different 3D printing techniques,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, In progress, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1177/09544089241239591.

[7]           J. Lüchtenborg et al., “Implementation of fused filament fabrication in dentistry,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11146444.

[8]           A. Kafle, E. Luis, R. Silwal, H. M. Pan, P. L. Shrestha, and A. K. Bastola, “3D/4D printing of polymers: Fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA),” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3101, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/polym13183101.

[9]           A. Sharma et al., “Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 32239, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17487-z.

[10]         S. Y. Sonaye et al., “Influence of fused deposition modeling parameters on the mechanical and thermal properties of 3D-printed peek dental endosseous implants,” Dental Materials, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 109–125, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2025.09.013.

[11]         F. Rouzé l’Alzit, R. Cade, A. Naveau, J. Babilotte, M. Meglioli, and S. Catros, “Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 117, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103909.

[12]         S. Pieralli, B. C. Spies, V. Hromadnik, R. Nicic, F. Beuer, and C. Wesemann, “How accurate is oral implant installation using surgical guides printed from a degradable and steam-sterilized biopolymer?,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jcm9082322.

[13]         V. Berger, M. Green Buzhor, D. Evstafeva, L. Mügeli, and J.-C. Leroux, “3D printing of a controlled urea delivery device for the prevention of tooth decay,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 631, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122528.

[14]         S. Rues, D. Depré, T. Stober, P. Rammelsberg, and A. Zenthöfer, “Accuracy of polyether and vinylpolysiloxane impressions when using different types of 3D-printed impression trays - an in vitro study,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 28, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05962-2.

[15]         K. S. Priyadarshini, V. V. Nandini, R. Marimuthu, and J. Lathief, “Dimensional stability and retention strength of impressions to custom impression trays fabricated using conventional method and additive technology - an in-vitro study,” Indian Journal of Dental Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 427–432, 2023, doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_519_23.

[16]         M. A. Olawumi, F. T. Omigbodun, and B. I. Oladapo, “Improved biocompatibility in laser-polished implants,” Biomimetics, vol. 9, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9100642.

[17]         E.-K. Kim, E. Y. Park, and S. Kang, “Three-dimensional printing of temporary crowns with polylactic acid polymer using the fused deposition modeling technique: A case series,” Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 302–307, 2023, doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00612.

[18]         Y. Ishida, D. Miura, T. Miyasaka, and A. Shinya, “Dimensional accuracy of dental casting patterns fabricated using consumer 3D printers,” Polymers, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12102244.

[19]         K. Nagata, K. Inaba, K. Kimoto, and H. Kawana, “Accuracy of dental models fabricated using recycled poly-lactic acid,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16072620.

[20]         C. Bennett et al., “Optimization of 3D printing technology for fabrication of dental crown prototype using plastic powder and zirconia materials,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15238618.

[21]         A. Rey-Martí, D. Ribeiro-Soriano, and D. Palacios-Marqués, “A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1651–1655, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033.

[22]         J. M. Merigó and J.-B. Yang, “A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science,” Omega, vol. 73, pp. 37–48, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004.

[23]         F. J. Martínez-López, J. M. Merigó, L. Valenzuela-Fernández, and C. Nicolás, “Fifty years of the european journal of marketing: A bibliometric analysis,” European Journal of Marketing, vol. 52, no. 1/2, pp. 439–468, 2018, doi: 10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853.

[24]         P. Ahmad, J. A. Asif, M. K. Alam, and J. Slots, “A bibliometric analysis of periodontology 2000,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 82, no. 1. pp. 286–297, 2020, doi: 10.1111/prd.12328.

[25]         Z. Huang, H. Chen, and Z. Liu, “The 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in central venous catheter research: A prisma-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, vol. 57, p. 102803, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102803.

[26]         B. Jin, Y. Liu, S. Du, X. Sang, H. Yang, and Y. Mao, “Current trends and research topics regarding liver 3D bioprinting: A bibliometric analysis research,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 10, p. 1047524, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1047524.

[27]         G.-X. Lin, C.-M. Chen, G. Rui, and B.-S. Hu, “Research relating to three-dimensional (3D) printing in spine surgery: A bibliometric analysis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 395–407, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07376-8.

[28]         Z. Yang et al., “Research landscape of 3D printing in bone regeneration and bone repair: A bibliometric and visualized analysis from 2012 to 2022,” International Journal of Bioprinting, vol. 9, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.18063/ijb.737.

[29]         B. M. Fasogbon and O. A. Adebo, “A bibliometric analysis of 3D food printing research: A global and african perspective,” Future Foods, vol. 6, p. 100175, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100175.

[30]         D. O. Aghimien, C. O. Aigbavboa, A. E. Oke, and W. D. Thwala, “Mapping out research focus for robotics and automation research in construction-related studies: A bibliometric approach,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1063–1079, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-09-2019-0237.

[31]         H. Mastrisiswadi, W. P. Sari, Herianto, and A. E. Tontowi, “Systematic literature review of fused deposition modeling (FDM) strain sensor and soft pneumatic actuator,” International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 787–805, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41315-024-00346-x.

[32]         S. Cailleaux, N. M. Sanchez-Ballester, Y. A. Gueche, B. Bataille, and I. Soulairol, “Fused deposition modeling (FDM), the new asset for the production of tailored medicines,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 330, pp. 821–841, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.056.

[33]         J. Mogan et al., “Fused deposition modelling of polymer composite: A progress,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 28, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15010028.

[34]         D. Oros, M. Penčić, M. Orošnjak, and S. Kedziora, “Additive manufacturing technologies and their applications in dentistry: A systematic literature review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 8346, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15158346.

[35]         T. H. Barker et al., “The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies,” JBI Evidence Synthesis, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 378, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00268.

[36]         I. Ferreira, M. R. de Campos, B. D. Sahm, M. L. da Costa Valente, J. A. Marcondes Agnelli, and A. C. dos Reis, “Influence of post-processing on the adhesion of dual-species biofilm on polylactic acid obtained by additive manufacturing,” Saudi Dental Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 733–739, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.03.001.

[37]         W.-I. Choi, L.-G. Yoo, Y.-R. Kim, and B.-Y. Jung, “Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM polylactic acid as a material for interim restoration,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15314.

[38]         K. Wakamori, K. Nagata, T. Nakashizu, H. Tsuruoka, M. Atsumi, and H. Kawana, “Comparative verification of the accuracy of implant models made of PLA, resin, and silicone,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16093307.

[39]         N. M. Nguyen, A. B. Kakarla, S. G. Nukala, C. Kong, A. Baji, and I. Kong, “Evaluation of physicochemical properties of a hydroxyapatite polymer nanocomposite for use in fused filament fabrication,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15193980.

[40]         K. Nagata et al., “Fit accuracy of resin crown on a dental model fabricated using fused deposition modeling 3D printing and a polylactic acid filament,” Journal of Prosthodontic Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 144–149, 2023, doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00325.

[41]         S.-M. Park, J.-M. Park, S.-K. Kim, S.-J. Heo, and J.-Y. Koak, “Flexural strength of 3D-printing resin materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13183970.

[42]         N. K. Balasubramainian, L. Kothandaraman, T. Sathish, J. Giri, and M. I. Ammarullah, “Optimization of process parameters to minimize circularity error and surface roughness in fused deposition modelling (FDM) using taguchi method for biomedical implant fabrication,” Advanced Manufacturing: Polymer and Composites Science, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/20550340.2024.2406156.

[43]         M. A. Hamed and T. F. Abbas, “The impact of FDM process parameters on the compression strength of 3D printed PLA filaments for dental applications,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 121–129, 2023, doi: 10.12913/22998624/169468.

[44]         Y. Liu, Y. Lin, and P. Di, “A modified implant abutment holder fabricated with fused deposition modeling to improve the transfer process for implant-supported restorations,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 411–414, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.029.

[45]         N. De Angelis et al., “Multipotent mesenchymal cells homing and differentiation on poly(ε-caprolactone) blended with 20% tricalcium phosphate and polylactic acid incorporating 10% hydroxyapatite 3D-printed scaffolds via a commercial fused deposition modeling 3D device,” Biology, vol. 12, no. 12, 2023, doi: 10.3390/biology12121474.

[46]         N. Lümkemann, M. Klimenta, M. Hoffmann, J. Meinen, and B. Stawarczyk, “Dimensional stability and reproducibility of varying FFF models for aligners in comparison to plaster models,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 13, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16134835.

[47]         A. Mousa and N. Mohamed, “Assessment of trueness and precision of FDM 3D printed maxillary arch models obtained from CBCT scans,” Advanced Dental Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 406–416, 2024, doi: 10.21608/adjc.2023.231957.1389.

[48]         C.-H. Im, J.-M. Park, J.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Kang, and J.-H. Kim, “Assessment of compatibility between various intraoral scanners and 3D printers through an accuracy analysis of 3D printed models,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13194419.

[49]         W. Grzebieluch, M. Grajzer, and M. Mikulewicz, “Comparative analysis of fused deposition modeling and digital light processing techniques for dimensional accuracy in clear aligner manufacturing,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 29, p. e940922, 2023, doi: 10.12659/MSM.940922.

[50]         M. Richter, T. Peter, S. Rüttermann, R. Sader, and L. B. Seifert, “3D printed versus commercial models in undergraduate conservative dentistry training,” European Journal of Dental Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 643–651, 2022, doi: 10.1111/eje.12742.

[51]         V. P. Gonçalves et al., “Evaluation of mechanical properties of abs-like resin for stereolithography versus ABS for fused deposition modeling in three-dimensional printing applications for odontology,” Polymers, vol. 16, no. 20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/polym16202921.

[52]         M. Metlerski, K. Grocholewicz, A. Jaroń, M. Lipski, and G. Trybek, “Comparison of presurgical dental models manufactured with two different three-dimensional printing techniques,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/8893338.

[53]         B. N. de Freitas et al., “Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 128, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104387.

[54]         E. Anadioti, B. Kane, Y. Zhang, M. Bergler, F. Mante, and M. B. Blatz, “Accuracy of dental and industrial 3D printers,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 31, pp. 30–37, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jopr.13470.

[55]         S. T. Jaber, M. Y. Hajeer, T. Z. Khattab, and L. Mahaini, “Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners,” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 591–600, 2021, doi: 10.1002/cre2.366.

[56]         D. Miura, Y. Ishida, and A. Shinya, “The effects of different molding orientations, highly accelerated aging, and water absorption on the flexural strength of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) fabricated by fused deposition modeling,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15071602.

[57]         X. Han et al., “Tailoring the biologic responses of 3D printed PEEK medical implants by plasma functionalization,” Dental Materials, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1083–1098, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.026.

[58]         X. Han et al., “A balance of biocompatibility and antibacterial capability of 3D printed PEEK implants with natural totarol coating,” Dental Materials, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 674–688, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.011.

[59]         K. I. Wong, Y. Zhong, D. Li, Z. Cheng, Z. Yu, and M. Wei, “Modified porous microstructure for improving bone compatibility of poly-ether-ether-ketone,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 120, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104541.

[60]         T. Soares, C. Fernandes, C. Barbosa, M. A. P. Vaz, T. Reis, and M. H. Figueiral, “Surface roughness of polyetheretherketone printed by fused deposition modeling: A pilot study investigating the impact of print layer thickness and polishing method,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14073096.

[61]         S. Paszkiewicz et al., “The mechanical, thermal, and biological properties of materials intended for dental implants: A comparison of three types of poly(aryl-ether-ketones) (PEEK and PEKK),” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 18, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15183706.

[62]         V. K. Bokam, S. Y. Sonaye, P. Nagaraju, H. P. S. Naganaboyina, and P. Sikder, “Extrusion of uniform-diameter polyetheretherketone-magnesium phosphate bio-composite filaments for 3D printing of design-specific multi-functional implants,” Materials Advances, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 2926–2939, 2023, doi: 10.1039/d3ma00172e.

[63]         T. Schüler et al., “Degradable polycaprolactone/buffer composites as pH regulating carrier materials for drug delivery and 3D printed biomaterials,” Materialia, vol. 34, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2024.102087.

[64]         V. Berger, Z. Luo, and J.-C. Leroux, “3D printing of a controlled fluoride delivery device for the prevention and treatment of tooth decay,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 348, pp. 870–880, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.032.

[65]         D. Palaszkó et al., “Trueness of five different 3D printing systems including budget- and professional-grade printers: An in vitro study,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26874.

[66]         S. Shujaat, E. Shaheen, F. Novillo, C. Politis, and R. Jacobs, “Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography–derived casts: A comparative study,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.021.

[67]         K. K. Alanazi, D. Wood, J. Shepherd, C. W. Stokes, and I. O. Asencio, “Assessing the suitability of fused deposition modeling to produce acrylic removable denture bases,” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, vol. 10, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.1002/cre2.880.

[68]         N. H. Obaeed and W. K. Hamdan, “Optimizing fused deposition modelling process parameters for medical grade polymethylmethacrylate flexural strength,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 349–359, 2024, doi: 10.12913/22998624/182876.

[69]         M. W. M. Cunico, “Investigation of ceramic dental prostheses based on zrsio4-glass composites fabricated by indirect additive manufacturing,” International Journal of Bioprinting, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2021, doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i1.315.

[70]         M. N. Shunmugam, S. Sankaranarayanan, N. Pandiarajan, B. K. Parrthipan, and B. Pandiarajan, “Enhancing mechanical properties of PLA filaments through orange peel powder reinforcement: Optimization of 3D printing parameters,” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 7536, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.asep.2024.08.011.

[71]         T. Anto, R. C. Rajendran, A. Agarwal, E. Jayamani, and V. D. Natarajan, “Investigation of mechanical properties of 3D printed biodegradable polylactic acid reinforced with paper microcrystalline cellulose,” Applied Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 7541, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.14416/j.asep.2024.08.007.

[72]         R. Told et al., “Manufacturing a first upper molar dental forceps using continuous fiber reinforcement (CFR) additive manufacturing technology with carbon-reinforced polyamide,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/polym13162647.

[73]         H. Eliasova et al., “Surface morphology of three-dimensionally printed replicas of upper dental arches,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10165708.

[74]         D. S. Nakonieczny, F. Kern, L. Dufner, M. Antonowicz, and K. Matus, “Alumina and zirconia-reinforced polyamide pa-12 composites for biomedical additive manufacturing,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma14206201.

[75]         S. Spintzyk, R. Schmunk, P. Kraemer Fernandez, F. Huettig, and A. Unkovskiy, “3D printing of polyamide to fabricate a non-metal clasp removable partial denture via fused filament fabrication: A case report,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168241.

[76]         M. E. Cooke et al., “3D printed polyurethane scaffolds for the repair of bone defects,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 8, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.557215.

[77]         S. Belayutham, W. N. W. Hassan, F. A. Razak, and N. N. M. Tahir, “Microbial adherence on vacuum-formed retainers with different surface roughness as constructed from conventional stone models and 3D printed models: A randomized controlled clinical trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3245–3259, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04940-4.

[78]         M. S. Hajjaj et al., “Flexural strength, flexural modulus and microhardness of milled vs. fused deposition modeling printed zirconia; effect of conventional vs. speed sintering,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03829-8.

[79]         S. T. Gobena and A. D. Woldeyohannes, “Assessments and investigation of process parameter impacts on surface roughness, microstructure, tensile strength, and porosity of 3D printed polyetherether ketone (PEEK) materials,” Results in Engineering, vol. 24, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103317.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.14416/j.asep.2026.04.007

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2025 by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. All rights reserved.